Share On:

Rushcliffe residents: have your say on boundary changes

13th September 2012

Rushcliffe residents: have your say on boundary changes

18th September 2012

The independent Local Government Boundary Commission for England is asking people across Rushcliffe to comment on its draft proposals for new electoral arrangements for Rushcliffe Borough Council.

An eight-week public consultation on the recommendations begins today and will end on 12 November 2012. The consultation is open to anyone in Rushcliffe who wants to have their say on new council wards, ward boundaries and ward names across the borough.

The Commission's draft recommendations propose that Rushcliffe Borough Council should have 44 borough councillors in the future - six fewer than under the current arrangements. The recommendations also outline how those councillors should represent eleven single-member, nine two-member and five three-member wards across the borough.

The full recommendations and detailed maps are available on the Commission's website at /all-reviews/east-midlands/nottinghamshire/rushcliffe-fer. Residents can also take an in depth look at the proposed boundaries through the Commission's dedicated web portal at

Hard copies of the Commission's report and maps will also be available to view at council buildings and libraries.

Max Caller CBE, Chair of the Commission, said: "We are publishing proposals for a new pattern of wards across Rushcliffe and we are keen to hear what local people think of the recommendations.

"Over the next eight weeks, we are asking local people to tell us if they agree with the proposals or if not, how they can be improved.

"Our review aims to deliver electoral equality for Rushcliffe's voters. This means that each borough councillor represents a similar number of people so that everyone's vote in borough council elections is worth roughly the same regardless of where you live.

"We also want to ensure that our proposals reflect the interests and identities of local communities across Rushcliffe and that the pattern of wards can help the council deliver effective local government to local people.

"We will consider all the submissions we receive whoever they are from and whether your evidence applies to the whole borough or just a part of it.

"Our draft recommendations are based on evidence presented to us by local political groups, organisations and our own views on the best electoral arrangements for the borough. We have an open mind about further suggestions from local people to change and improve these recommendations."

The Commission wants to hear as much evidence as possible in order to develop final recommendations for Rushcliffe Borough Council. If you would like to make a submission to the Commission, please write or email us by 12 November 2012:

The Review Officer (Rushcliffe)
Local Government Boundary Commission for England
Layden House
76-86 Turnmill Street

Or email: [email protected]

For further information contact: Press Office: 020 7664 8530 [email protected]


Notes to editors:

1. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is responsible for reviewing local authority electoral arrangements, defining boundaries for local elections and the number of councillors to be elected, as well as conducting reviews of local government external boundaries and structures.

2. The Commission is carrying out the electoral review because Rushcliffe currently has relatively high levels of electoral inequality. For example, South Keyworth ward currently has 20% fewer voters per councillor than the average for the borough. In Stanford ward, on the other hand, each councillor represents 23% more people than the average. Overall this means that local people's votes, at borough council elections, are worth different amounts depending on where they live in Rushcliffe. The Commission also received a request from Rushcliffe Borough Council in February 2011 to undertake an electoral review.

3. The types of questions the Commission is asking residents at this stage are:

  • Do the proposed wards reflect local communities?
  • How do you think the proposals can be improved whilst maintaining electoral equality?
  • Are the names of the proposed wards right?

4. Residents have from 18 September until 12 November 2012 to have their say about where ward boundaries for Rushcliffe should be drawn. The Commission will consider all submissions and aims to publish its final recommendations in February 2013. Once the Commission agrees its final recommendations it will lay a draft order in both Houses of Parliament. Parliament will then have 40 days in which to consider the recommendations. If both Houses are satisfied with the recommendations, the draft order will be 'made' and the new wards will come into effect at the council elections in May 2015.