LGBCE's site uses cookies to make your experience easier. Close this box to accept or go to our cookies page to find out more

The Boundary Committee announces proposals for electoral arrangements in Gloucestershire

27th April 2004

The Boundary Committee announces proposals for electoral arrangements in Gloucestershire

27th April 2004

This is an archived news release and links may no longer work.

27 April 2004

Final plans for new electoral arrangements in Gloucestershire are being submitted to The Electoral Commission today. The recommendations from The Boundary Committee for England mark the end of a review which began in August 2002. They include changes to division boundaries across the area.

Pamela Gordon, Chair of the Committee said: During autumn 2003 a successful public consultation on the draft recommendations was carried out. The responses have led to us changing some of the proposals. The aim of the review has been to ensure that, as far as possible, one persons vote should have the same value as anothers. The improvements in electoral equality we are recommending today meet that objective without disrupting community interests.

The Electoral Commission is now responsible for deciding the outcome of the Committees recommendations and all further correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, The Electoral Commission, Trevelyan House, Great Peter Street, London SW1P 2HW.

The boundaries of all divisions will be subject to change. All divisions are based on district wards, which changed as a result of the recent district council Periodic Electoral Reviews. The Committee is confirming its draft recommendations as final subject to the following boundary modifications and division name changes.

  • In Forest of Dean district, Lydney division should comprise the district wards of Lydney North, Lydney East and an area of West Lydney. Pillowell  borough we are proposing three division name changes.
  • In Stroud district Berkeley Vale division should comprise Severn and Berkeley wards, with Vale ward less Stinchcombe parish. Cam & Dursley division should comprise Cam East, Cam West, Coaley & Uley, Dursley and Stinchcombe parish. North Stroud division should comprise the wards of Eastington & Standish, Hardwicke and Over Stroud. Upton St Leonards, Bisley & Painswick should comprise the wards of the same name.
  • In Gloucester City we are proposing three division name changes, in Stroud district we are proposing one division name change and in Tewkesbury2003 and are also available on the Committees web site at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk

The final recommendations are for a council size of 63 councillors as at present representing 53 divisions.

The Committees reports are available on its website at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk or at council offices and at public libraries. Copies of the report can also be obtained by writing to The Boundary Committee for England, Trevelyan House, Great Peter Street, London SW1P 2HW.

For further information contact:

Elise Cross on 020 7271 0530 or Gemma Crosland on 020 7271 0527

Out of Office hours 07789 920 414, Fax: 020 7271 0528

ecross@electoralcommission.org.uk

www.electoralcommission.org.uk

/ends

Notes to editors:

  1. PDFs of maps are available on The Boundary Committees website www.boundarycommittee.org.uk  For copyright permission, contact Ordnance Surveys helpline on 023 8030 5092.
  2. The present review of Gloucestershire began on 6 August 2002. Draft recommendations were published on 27 August & Littledean division should comprise the district wards of Awre, Littledean & Ruspidge and Pillowell. Tidenham division should comprise Tidenham and Hewelsfield & Woolaston wards and the parishes of Alvington and Aylburton.

The Boundary Committee is a statutory committee of The Electoral Commission.