LGBCE's site uses cookies to make your experience easier. Close this box to accept or go to our cookies page to find out more

Local views sought on number of councillors for High Peak

19th July 2013

Local views sought on number of councillors for High Peak

23rd July 2013

The independent Local Government Boundary Commission for England is asking local people how many councillors they think should represent High Peak Borough Council in the future.

The six-week public consultation is the first part of an electoral review which will also consider changes to the number, names and boundaries of the council's wards.

The Commission has considered evidence submitted to it by the council and is now consulting residents on a proposal that would see the authority continue to be represented by 43 councillors.

The Commission is asking local people whether they think 43 is still the right number of councillors for High Peak or whether there should be more, or fewer, councillors in future.

Max Caller, Chair of the Commission, said: "This is your chance to shape your council for the future.

"We are asking people across the borough whether they agree that 43 councillors is still the right number to represent High Peak.

"We want to know if you think 43 is the right number of councillors to be able to take decisions effectively and whether it's the right number to represent the interests of all the borough's communities.

"If you don't agree that High Peak should be represented by 43 councillors, we want you to tell us your alternative and why you think there should be more, or fewer, members of the council in the future.

"Once we have taken a view on the number of councillors, we will re-draw ward boundaries to accommodate those elected members and we will ask local people to have their say during that process as well."

Further information about the review is available at www.lgbce.org.uk.

Residents can have their say directly at consultation.lgbce.org.uk

Email reviews@lgbce.org.uk>.

Follow the Commission on Twitter @LGBCE.

Write to:

The Review Officer (High Peak)
Local Government Boundary Commission for England
Layden House
76-86 Turnmill Street
London
EC1M 5LG

 

The current phase of consultation closes on 2 September 2013. Once it has considered the evidence provided by local people and organisations, the Commission will publish its proposal on the total number of councillors in October 2013 and then begin to gather information to help draw up new ward boundaries.

The Commission aims to publish its draft recommendations for a new pattern of wards for High Peak in March 2014 when it will consult local people again. Final recommendations are due to be published in September 2014 and the new electoral arrangements would come into effect for the council elections in 2015.

ends/

For further information contact the Commission's press office on: 0207 664 8530/8534 or email: press@lgbce.org.uk>

Notes to editors

1. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is responsible for reviewing local authority electoral arrangements e.g. defining boundaries for local elections and the number of councillors to be elected. The Commission also carries out reviews of the external boundaries of local authorities and their structure.

2. The Commission is carrying out an electoral review of High Peak to deliver electoral equality for voters in local elections. The borough currently has relatively high levels of electoral inequality where some councillors represent significantly more, or fewer, than other member of the council. For example, Padfield ward has 23% more voters in it than the average for the borough. The situation means that the value of your vote varies depending on where you live in High Peak.

3. In this phase of consultation, the Commission is asking local people to consider whether 43 councillors is the right number for High Peak and, if not, how many would better promote effective and convenient local government. In coming to a conclusion on council size, the Commission is also asking people to consider the following types of questions:

  • Do you think 43 councillors is the right number for the council to be able to take decisions for High Peak effectively?
  • Could 43 councillors effectively represent the interests of all High Peak's various communities?